2008-09 Connecticut High School Hockey Rankings

Mismatch games (between teams rated more than 4 goals apart) are not used in ratings calculations. 

RANK  TEAM                               W  L  T   >4   GmPerf Sched  Total  Last 5    
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
  1,Fairfield Prep,CT,__________________ 12  6  1,  0   1.5,   9.1,  10.66,  9.29 
  2,Trinity Catholic,CT,________________ 19  2  0,  4   2.7,   7.8,  10.51,  9.31 
  3,Hamden,CT,__________________________ 14  4  1,  0   0.9,   8.7,   9.70,  8.45 
  4,Notre Dame-Fairfield,CT,____________ 15  4  1,  1   1.1,   8.5,   9.61,  9.57 
  5,Simsbury,CT,________________________ 14  5  1,  2   1.4,   7.9,   9.35,  9.53 
  6,Xavier,CT,__________________________ 11  7  0,  1   0.9,   8.2,   9.17,  9.25 
  7,Fermi,CT,___________________________ 14  4  1,  2   1.1,   7.9,   9.05,  9.47 
  8,Glastonbury,CT,_____________________ 13  5  2,  0   1.4,   7.5,   8.91,  8.21 
  9,West Haven,CT,______________________ 10 10  0,  1   0.3,   8.5,   8.85,  9.33 
 10,Greenwich,CT,_______________________ 13  5  3,  1   1.4,   7.3,   8.69,  8.53 
 11,Enfield,CT,_________________________ 14  5  0,  1   1.5,   7.2,   8.69,  7.92 
 12,Notre Dame-West Haven,CT,___________  9  9  1,  0  -0.2,   8.8,   8.68, 10.41 
 13,New Canaan,CT,______________________ 10  8  3,  1   0.4,   8.1,   8.51,  8.80 
 14,Tri-Town,CT,________________________ 13  6  1,  1   1.1,   7.3,   8.45,  6.85 
 15,Branford,CT,________________________ 13  5  1,  2   1.3,   7.1,   8.36,  9.67 
 16,East Haven,CT,______________________ 11  6  1,  1   0.7,   7.6,   8.26,  8.81 
 17,Darien,CT,__________________________ 12  6  3,  1   0.1,   8.1,   8.23,  8.30 
 18,Cheshire,CT,________________________ 15  3  2,  1   1.5,   6.6,   8.13,  7.68 
 19,North Haven,CT,_____________________  9  8  2,  0  -0.2,   8.2,   8.04,  6.72 
 20,Ridgefield,CT,______________________  9 11  1,  1   0.0,   8.0,   7.99,  8.30 
 21,Staples-Weston,CT,__________________ 12  9  0,  2   1.1,   6.8,   7.95,  8.65 
 22,Conard,CT,__________________________ 11  8  1,  0  -0.1,   8.0,   7.89,  8.17 
 23,Amity,CT,___________________________ 12  6  1,  0   0.9,   6.9,   7.82,  7.40 
 24,Avon,CT,____________________________ 10  8  1,  0   0.1,   7.5,   7.56,  8.41 
 25,South Windsor,CT,___________________  7 13  1,  0  -0.5,   8.0,   7.47,  8.72 
 26,Suffield-Granby-Windsor Locks,CT,___ 13  6  0,  1   1.0,   6.5,   7.45,  7.46 
 27,Lyman Hall,CT,______________________ 15  4  0,  2   1.2,   6.2,   7.41,  8.04 
 28,Hall-Southington,CT,________________ 14  3  2,  4   1.7,   5.6,   7.31,  7.37 
 29,St Joseph,CT,_______________________ 12  8  1,  1   0.1,   7.1,   7.21,  5.54 
 30,Daniel Hand,CT,_____________________  5 11  1,  0  -0.9,   8.0,   7.05,  8.14 
 31,Stamford,CT,________________________ 11  9  1,  0   0.2,   6.7,   6.91,  6.28 
 32,East Catholic,CT,___________________  9 10  1,  0  -0.3,   7.1,   6.79,  6.61 
 33,Guilford,CT,________________________ 14  6  0,  4   1.0,   5.7,   6.74,  6.81 
 34,Fairfield Warde/Ludlowe,CT,_________  7 11  2,  0  -0.4,   7.1,   6.73,  7.61 
 35,St Bernard-Bacon,CT,________________ 11  9  0,  1   0.6,   6.1,   6.71,  7.38 
 36,Farmington,CT,______________________  6 13  1,  0  -0.8,   7.4,   6.58,  5.37 
 37,Bethel-Brookfield-Danbury,CT,_______ 15  4  0,  0   1.4,   5.1,   6.51,  6.53 
 38,Immaculate,CT,______________________  4 15  0,  0  -2.0,   8.5,   6.48,  6.29 
 39,North Branford,CT,__________________  4 13  2,  0  -1.5,   7.7,   6.19,  6.49 
 40,Northwest Catholic,CT,______________ 13  4  2,  4   0.1,   6.0,   6.18,  6.13 
 41,Housatonic-Northwestern,CT,_________ 11  9  0,  0   0.0,   6.1,   6.13,  6.43 
 42,New Milford,CT,_____________________  8 12  0,  0  -0.2,   6.2,   6.01,  6.34 
 43,Rocky Hill-RHAM,CT,_________________ 10  8  2,  0   0.6,   5.3,   5.87,  5.90 
 44,Joel Barlow,CT,_____________________ 12  7  0,  1   0.7,   5.2,   5.85,  6.02 
 45,Trumbull,CT,________________________  6 12  1,  1  -0.9,   6.6,   5.74,  5.21 
 46,Westhill,CT,________________________  4 15  1,  1  -1.4,   7.1,   5.71,  4.54 
 47,Wilton,CT,__________________________  7 12  0,  1  -0.9,   6.5,   5.52,  4.69 
 48,Rockville-Manchester,CT,____________  8 11  0,  0  -0.4,   5.5,   5.11,  4.76 
 49,Masuk,CT,___________________________ 10  9  0,  0  -0.3,   5.4,   5.10,  5.51 
 50,Newington-Berlin,CT,________________  9 10  1,  0  -0.1,   5.2,   5.00,  4.71 
 51,Watertown-Pomperaug,CT,_____________  6 12  1,  0  -1.0,   6.0,   4.97,  4.18 
 52,Wethersfield,CT,____________________  3 16  1,  3  -2.1,   7.0,   4.89,  4.72 
 53,EO Smith-Tolland-Windham,CT,________  7 11  2,  1  -0.2,   4.9,   4.70,  5.19 
 54,Sheehan,CT,_________________________  2 17  0,  0  -2.0,   6.5,   4.46,  3.67 
 55,Milford Coop,CT,____________________  2 16  0,  1  -2.2,   6.6,   4.35,  4.58 
 56,Bolton-Coventry-Lyman Memorial,CT,__  6 13  0,  0  -1.0,   5.2,   4.18,  4.56 
 57,Newtown,CT,_________________________  5 14  0,  3  -0.8,   4.8,   3.96,  3.70 
 58,Shelton,CT,_________________________  4 15  0,  2  -1.2,   4.8,   3.65,  3.64 
 59,Shepaug-Litchfield-Wamogo,CT,_______  5 13  1,  0  -1.4,   4.7,   3.36,  2.10 
 60,Norwalk-McMahon,CT,_________________  0 19  1,  8  -3.2,   5.4,   2.22,  1.94 
 61,Fitch-East Lyme-Ledyard,CT,_________  2 17  0,  9  -2.6,   3.8,   1.19,  1.86 
 62,Windsor-East Granby,CT,_____________  1 19  0,  7  -3.2,   3.5,   0.38,  0.53 

Since some "mismatch" games are not used in determining the rankings, the Sched column can be 
somewhat misleading as it reflects the average opponent strength of only the opponents ranked 
within 4 goals of each team.